Cells & Roses

Cedar May 16th, 2007

Yesterday I was playing around with paint, and what started out as an aimless play session (which I sometimes do to loosen up and stop being so serious) ended up yielding some abstract paintings that I rather like. I call them “cells” because they are made up of rough rectangular shapes fit together, and remind me of plant cells under a microscope.

These are all 16″ x 20″ and oil on canvas:

Cells 1

cells 1

Cells 2

cells 2

Cells 3

cells 3

They are not for sale just yet, but probably will be in the future. (I like them and want to keep them for myself for a while.)

I planted a rosebush in my front yard last week. The variety is called the Peace Rose. When I planted it, it had a few tiny little green flower buds. All I did was plant it, give it some compost, and water it every day. Now look at it!! I think I want to grow some different kinds of roses now.

rosebush 1

rosebush 2

My Peace Roses inspired this simple little painting, which was also part of the play session, which also turned out to be something worth keeping:

Rose
28″ x 14″ Oil on Canvas

rose

If you’ve ever heard the term “gallery-wrapped canvas” and you don’t know what it means, this is an example of a gallery-wrapped canvas. The canvas is stretched around a deep wooden frame, (made of “stretcher bars” or “strainers”) and stapled on the back rather than on the side, so that the side is covered in staple-free canvas. Normally when using a gallery-wrapped canvas, I continue the painting onto the edges of the canvas. I really like the visual effect of this–simple, clean, and modern–when hung on a wall.

gallery wrap

No frame is needed for this type of canvas. If I frame a painting, it will be either a simple wooden or satin black strip frame. I have some kind of deep-seated revulsion to fancy, ornate frames, especially if they’re gold-tone. The more ornate the frame, the stronger my revulsion. I can’t explain this–it just doesn’t mesh with my aesthetic.

2 Responses to “Cells & Roses”

  1. Jennon 17 May 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Wow, wow, and wow.

    First of all, I’m a big fan of abstract pieces and those are incredible. Really. I’m also a big fan of no frames. Well, not always no frames but sometimes they just take away from a piece. The rose turned out beautifully. :)

    I giggled over the foot in the picture of the rose bush. Love the shoes, though! ;) The roses almost remind me of a lighter shade of the “Joseph’s Coat Rose.” Here’s a picture I hunted down…

    Hopefully that HTML works. hah.

  2. Jennon 17 May 2007 at 12:51 pm

    Well darn, it didn’t. So here’s the direct link instead.

    http://static.flickr.com/45/168337159_852b4983ac.jpg

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply